Key result
Macrophage-specific SIRPA deletion reduces post-injury intimal hyperplasia by promoting protective M2 polarization.
Why the study?
Does SIRPA ablation prevent intimal hyperplasia in mouse models of arterial injury?
Does SIRPA ablation prevent intimal hyperplasia in mouse models of arterial injury?
SIRPA ablation inhibits intimal hyperplasia by promoting PPARγ-regulated alternative macrophage polarization, suggesting SIRPA as a potential therapeutic target for arterial restenosis.
Signal regulatory protein-a (SIRPA) serves as a pivotal immune checkpoint by binding to CD47, a mechanism recognized for its antitumor potential and increasing relevance in cardiovascular diseases. However, the role and regulatory mechanisms of SIRPA in intimal hyperplasia remain poorly defined. GEO databases revealed that SIRPA expression is elevated in human atherosclerotic plaques and in-stent restenosis patients. In current study, we utilized wire-injured mouse carotid arteries and macrophages stimulated with LPS or IL-4 to demonstrate significant upregulation of SIRPA following injury and pro-inflammatory stimulation, as confirmed by RT-PCR and immunoblotting. Double immunofluorescence staining showed predominant SIRPA expression localized to macrophages in the neointima of murine arteries and plaques of human atherosclerotic coronary arteries. Global SIRPA-knockout mice (SIRPA-KO) and bone marrow transplantation from SIRPA-KO to WT mice showed that macrophage-specific SIRPA deletion mitigated wire injury-induced intimal hyperplasia. Loss-of-function experiments in BMDMs indicated that SIRPA depletion reduced classical M1 polarization while enhancing alternative M2 activation. Subsequent coculture assays revealed that the reprogramming of macrophages due to SIRPA ablation suppressed vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) proliferation, migration, and dedifferentiation. Furthermore, the protective effect of SIRPA deficiency on intimal hyperplasia was attributed to enhanced alternative macrophage activation and a consequent reduction in VSMC phenotypic switching. Mechanistically, SIRPA knockout promoted alternative macrophage polarization through PPARg upregulation, as evidenced by the reversal of this phenotype upon treatment with the PPARg-specific antagonist G3335. Collectively, these findings unveil a previously unrecognized regulatory axis governing intimal hyperplasia and propose SIRPA as a promising therapeutic target for arterial restenosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2026) studied Intimal hyperplasia. SIRPA ablation vs. Wild-type (WT) controls was evaluated on Intimal hyperplasia. Macrophage-specific SIRPA deletion mitigated wire injury-induced intimal hyperplasia by promoting PPARγ-regulated alternative M2 macrophage polarization.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: