Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective case-control study assesses nail diameter's effect on nonunion in femoral fractures, suggesting implications for surgical practices.
Background and Objective: Locked intramedullary (IM) nails are the primary treatment modality for femoral shaft fractures. This study aimed to determine the risk of developing a femur nonunion as a function of nail-to-bone diameter mismatch. Materials and Methods: A retrospective case-control study was performed at a Level I trauma center. Adult patients with femoral shaft fractures (AO/OTA 32 classification) treated with IM nail fixation from 2016 to 2022 were identified from the institutional database. Cases required nonunion surgery. Controls were randomly selected in a 3:1 ratio and included only if fractures healed at final follow-up based on the modified Radiographic Union Score of the femur (mRUSF). The primary outcome was nonunion. The study compared the association of nonunion with nail diameter (range, 9 mm to 13 mm) relative to femur width (range, 12 mm to 36 mm) and adjusted for smoking status, open fracture, and the degree of comminution. Results: In total, 203 patients were included: 50 cases and 153 controls. Patients with a femur anterior-to-posterior diameter >22 mm at the level of the lesser trochanter (11% of this sample) were at increased odds for nonunion when treated with a small diameter IM nail (odds ratio [OR], 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2–3.7; P = .01). In patients with narrower femur diameters, the nail diameter was not associated with increased odds of nonunion surgery. Conclusion: Larger IM nails (≥11 mm) might have protected against nonunion in patients with wide femoral canals (≥22 mm) but likely conferred no significant benefit in patients with narrower femoral canals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brand et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: