Key result
HRV-F implementation in spinal cord injury rehab faces numerous provider-identified barriers and facilitators.
Why the study?
This study aimed to explore healthcare providers' experiences delivering heart rate variability feedback therapy to individuals with spinal cord injury and identify facilitators and barriers to its implementation into usual rehabilitation care.
What are the facilitators and barriers to implementing heart rate variability feedback therapy for individuals with spinal cord injury from the perspective of healthcare providers?
What are the facilitators and barriers to implementing heart rate variability feedback therapy for individuals with spinal cord injury from the perspective of healthcare providers?
Implementation of HRV-F therapy in SCI rehabilitation requires addressing workplace culture, funding, and IT barriers while leveraging evidence-based practices and clinical champions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May inform targeted strategies to address HRV feedback barriers in spinal cord injury; leaves open real-world adoption and outcomes.
Background This study aimed to explore healthcare providers’ experiences of delivering heart rate variability feedback (HRV-F) therapy to individuals living with spinal cord injury (SCI) and identify potential facilitators and barriers to implementing HRV-F into usual rehabilitation care. Methods Six healthcare providers involved in delivering HRV-F therapy participated in an interview. The interviews were dual coded to the domains and constructs of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) version 2.0 to identify potential barriers and facilitators for implementation. Results From the interviews, 166 facilitators and 187 barriers were identified and mapped into 29 interview statements for facilitators and 30 interview statements for barriers under CFIR domains, constructs and sub-constructs. The key facilitators included: (i) evidence-based implementation of HRV-F therapy, (ii) availability of champions and mentors among healthcare providers to promote delivery of HRV-F, and (iii) adaptability of HRV-F therapy to implement in different contexts and for different needs. Common barriers included: (i) workplace culture (ii) negative attitudes of healthcare providers towards HRV-F therapy, (iii) inadequate funding, (iv) information technology issues with HRV-F equipment, and (v) effectiveness of HRV-F for a wide range of individuals living with SCI. Conclusions The findings highlight potential facilitators and implementation strategies to overcome identified barriers to ensure effective adoption of HRV-F therapy into usual rehabilitation practices for individuals living with SCI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haque et al. (2026) studied Spinal cord injury (n=6). Heart rate variability feedback (HRV-F) therapy was evaluated on Facilitators and barriers to implementing HRV-F into usual rehabilitation care. Interviews with six healthcare providers identified 166 facilitators and 187 barriers to implementing heart rate variability feedback therapy into usual rehabilitation care for spinal cord injury.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: