Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In attempting to understand the dynamics of what distinguishes humans as a unique species, the author argues that humanistic psychology has limited itself to too narrow a definition of the human experience. From its beginning, it struggled with separation from the ideology of humanism and the question as to whether the transpersonal experience is a valid inquiry within its domain. Now it is time to tackle a different aspect of being fully human—our psychological relationship with our environment. This article attempts to explicate how the principles of humanistic psychology—self-actualization, awareness, responsibility, and authenticity—can address our environmental crisis through the concepts and practice of empathy, unconditional positive regard, and a wider identification beyond humankind to include the natural world. An ecological-humanistic psychology and worldview includes humans as part of the environment, not separate from it.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
James L. Kuhn (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: