Background: Zidebactam is a β-lactam enhancer antibiotic with a dual mechanism of action involving binding to Gram-negative PBP2 and β-lactamase inhibition. Cefepime combined with zidebactam (WCK 5222) is under clinical development for treatment of Gram-negative infections. Objectives: To evaluate the in vitro activities of cefepime and zidebactam separately and combined at 1:1 and 2:1 ratios when tested against Gram-negative organisms producing the most clinically relevant β-lactamase types. Methods: β-Lactamase-producing (193) and WT (71) isolates were tested for susceptibility by broth microdilution method against cefepime/zidebactam, cefepime and zidebactam. Results: Cefepime/zidebactam (1:1) was very active against Enterobacteriaceae producing CTX-M-15 (21; MIC 50/90 0.25/1 mg/L), SHV (20; MIC 50/90 0.12/0.25 mg/L), other ESBLs (20, including GES-18, OXA-1/30 and OXY-, PER-, TEM- and VEB-like; MIC 50/90 0.25/1 mg/L), plasmidic AmpC (10; MIC 50/90 ≤0.06/≤0.06 mg/L), derepressed AmpC (23; MIC 50/90 0.12/0.5 mg/L), KPC (35; MIC 50/90 0.25/1 mg/L) and metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs; 20 including VIM, IMP and NDM; MIC 50/90 0.5/8 mg/L). Cefepime/zidebactam (1:1) was also active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa with overexpression of AmpC (21; MIC 50/90 4/8 mg/L) and MBLs [12 (VIM and IMP); MIC 50/90 4/8 mg/L]. Zidebactam alone exhibited potent in vitro activity against some Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa , including β-lactamase-producing strains. Cefepime/zidebactam MIC values were lower than those of each agent tested alone for many β-lactamase-producing strains, indicating synergy. Cefepime/zidebactam showed moderate activity against OXA-23/24/58-producing Acinetobacter baumannii [MIC 50/90 32 mg/L (1:1)]. Conclusions: Cefepime/zidebactam showed potent activities against Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa producing various clinically relevant β-lactamases, including ESBLs, KPCs, AmpC and MBLs for which limited treatment options are currently available.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sader et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: