Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To compare vaginal length after iliococcygeus fixation (ICF) and sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients undergoing ICF or SSLF. Sixty-seven patients were identified and, of these, only 46 had complete data sets, leaving 23 patients in either group eligible for study. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in demographic data between the 2 groups. Mean vaginal length measurements were not significantly different before and after the ICF procedure (7.7+/-0.9 cm vs 7.6+/-0.8 cm, respectively; P=0.68). However, the mean vaginal length was significantly shortened following SSLF (7.9+/-0.8 cm vs 7.1+/-1.1 cm, P=0.001). The mean vaginal lengths preoperatively (7.7+/-0.9 cm vs 7.9+/-0.8 cm, P=0.51) and postoperatively (7.6+/-0.8 cm vs 7.1+/-1.1 cm, P=0.07) were similar. CONCLUSION: Iliococcygeus fixation does not significantly shorten vaginal length at the time of vaginal vault suspension, whereas the sacrospinous ligament fixation procedure does shorten vaginal length.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Medina et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: