Why the study?
Is ultrasound measurement of intra-abdominal distance a reliable alternative to computed tomography for evaluating visceral adiposity?
Is ultrasound measurement of intra-abdominal distance a reliable alternative to computed tomography for evaluating visceral adiposity?
Ultrasound measurement of intra-abdominal distance offers a reliable, accessible, and radiation-free alternative to CT for assessing visceral adiposity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support accessible radiation-free visceral fat assessment; leaves open prospective outcome validation before routine use.
Obesity is present in over 50% of men and 70% of women. Greater health risks development of cardio-vascular disease have been associated with the visceral obesity. Computed tomography is the reference method for intra-abdominal fat evaluation, but high cost, low availability and ionizing radiation risks prevent it from being a widely usable method. Ultrasound measurement of intra-abdominal distance between abdominal muscle and aorta, which has been shown to correlate well with computed tomography intra-abdominal fat measurements, is proposed together with other anthropometric measurements as an alternative means of predicting body fat and also confirmed as a reliable instrument for clinical and epidemiologic studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
N. M. Suslyaeva (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: