Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 1, 2002Journal of Viral Hepatitis

First phase viral kinetic parameters as predictors of treatment response and their influence on the second phase viral decline

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

JLJennifer E. LaydenCenters for Disease Control and PreventionTLThomas J. LaydenStanford UniversityKRK. Rajender ReddyGoethe University Frankfurt

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Layden et al. (2002) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1a930c9fa30811a0b8d01dhttps://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2893.2002.00377.x
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Differences in Viral Dynamics between Genotypes 1 and 2 of Hepatitis C Virus2000 · 227 citations
  2. 2Hepatitis C Viral Dynamics in Vivo and the Antiviral Efficacy of Interferon-α Therapy1998 · 2,128 citations
  3. 3Quantification of the initial decline of serum hepatitis c virus RNA and response to interferon alfa1998 · 170 citations
  4. 4Induction therapy with consensus interferon (CIFN) does not improve sustained virologic response in chronic hepatitis C2002 · 44 citations
  5. 5Early Hepatitis C Virus-Rna Responses Predict Interferon Treatment Outcomes in Chronic Hepatitis C1998 · 64 citations