Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article examines the reparation regime of the International Criminal Court in light of its first reparation decision. Based on the reparation jurisprudence established in international law and human rights law to provide victims of international crimes an effective remedy, this article suggests that in order for the International Criminal Court to achieve this objective it needs to go beyond individual criminal responsibility due to its limitations. This article considers the role of reparative complementarity in ensuring an effective remedy to victims of international crimes as part of the reparation regime of the International Criminal Court.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luke Moffett (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: