Why the study?
Critical limb ischemia lacks a reliable score for predicting outcomes, and whether the ABCD-GENE risk score applies to CLI remains unknown.
Does the ACD-GENE-CLI score improve the prediction of major adverse limb events in Asian patients with critical limb ischemia receiving clopidogrel post-endovascular intervention compared to conventional scores?
Does the ACD-GENE-CLI score improve the prediction of major adverse limb events in Asian patients with critical limb ischemia receiving clopidogrel post-endovascular intervention compared to conventional scores?
The modified ACD-GENE-CLI score improves the prediction of major adverse limb events in patients with critical limb ischemia receiving clopidogrel post-endovascular intervention.
May enhance MALE prediction in Asian CLI patients on clopidogrel; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
AIMS: Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is an emerging public health threat and lacks a reliable score for predicting the outcomes. The Age, Body Mass Index, Chronic Kidney Disease, Diabetes, and Genotyping (ABCD-GENE) risk score helps identify patients with coronary artery disease who have cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) polymorphism-related drug resistance and are at risk for cardiovascular adverse events. However, its application to CLI remains unknown. In this study, we aim to validate a modified ACD-GENE-CLI score to improve the prediction of major adverse limb events (MALEs) in patients with CLI receiving clopidogrel. METHODS: Patients with CLI receiving clopidogrel post-endovascular intervention were enrolled prospectively in two medical centers. Amputation and revascularization as MALEs were regarded as the outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 473 patients were recruited, with a mean follow-up duration of 25 months. Except for obesity, old age, diabetes, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and CYP2C19 polymorphisms were significantly associated with MALEs. Using bootstrap regression analysis, we established a modified risk score (ACD-GENE-CLI) that included old age (≥ 65 years), diabetes, CKD, and CYP2C19 polymorphisms. At a cutoff value of 8, the ACD-GENE-CLI score was superior to the CYP2C19 deficiency only, and the conventional ABCD-GENE score in predicting MALEs (area under the curve: 0.69 vs. 0.59 vs. 0.67, p=0.01). The diagnostic ability of the ACD-GENE-CLI score was consistent in the external validation. Also, Kaplan-Meier curves showed that in CYP2C19 deficiency, the ABCD-GENE and ACD-GENE-CLI scores could all differentiate patients with CLI who are free from MALEs. CONCLUSIONS: The modified ACD-GENE-CLI score could differentiate patients with CLI receiving clopidogrel who are at risk of MALEs. Further studies are required to generalize the utility of the score.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chang et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: