Why the study?
Does anticoagulation improve survival and VT resolution in patients with acute leukemia and CVC-related VT?
Does anticoagulation improve survival and VT resolution in patients with acute leukemia and CVC-related VT?
Anticoagulation for CVC-related DVT in acute leukemia patients appears safe and is associated with improved survival.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Anticoagulation was associated with improved survival in acute leukemia with CVC-VT; leaves open need for RCTs to confirm benefit and safety.
Patients with acute leukemia develop venous thrombosis (VT) related to central venous catheters (CVCs). Anticoagulation (AC) in these patients who are thrombocytopenic and often coagulopathic is challenging. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of AC in treating CVC-related VT, we retrospectively compared outcomes of patients with acute leukemia who were treated or not with AC during induction chemotherapy and post-discharge. Twenty-one patients with CVC-related VT received AC, 14 did not. VT resolved in 80% of patients in the AC group (similarly with low-dose and high-dose enoxaparin) and 45% in the non-AC group (p = 0.11). Fourteen (67%) patients in the AC group are alive (median survival not reached), compared to four patients (29%) in the non-AC group (median survival 9 months) (p = 0.015) with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.32 (95% confidence interval: 0.12-0.85) in favor of AC. HR remained < 1 after adjustments for leukemia type and cytogenetics. Bleeding (< grade 4) occurred in five and one patients in the AC vs. non-AC groups, respectively (p = 0.37).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oliver et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: