Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The study explored the relationship between target costing and competitiveness at Jordanian Private Universities.The research question regarding target costing focused on leadership of target selling price, customer needs,degree of developing a team work, cost of the product life cycle, stage of product design and value chaindevelopment. A questionnaire was used to elicit data. Two scales were used to measure the estimates by financialmanagers, directors of planning and quality, and heads of accounting departments in the universities. The samplesize was 50 subjects, and response rate was 80%. Findings of the study indicated that: universities have amedium target costing dimensions of (3.48); the dimension of target selling price leadership was the highest andreducing the life cycle of university specialization was the lowest; universities enjoy a medium competitiveadvantages with a score of (3.46); and expansion in specializations was the highest in performance anduniversity’s specializations cost was the weakest. Results showed a significant difference in the strength of linksbetween the dimensions of the target costing technique and the dimensions of strengthening the competitiveadvantage.Recommendations suggested that universities in general and Jordanian Private Universities in particular, have toactivate the dimensions of target costing technique to achieve the competitive advantages and promote it.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al-Awawdeh et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: