In patients undergoing aortic valve surgery, those with bicuspid valves have significantly narrower annular diameters compared to those with tricuspid valves, with differing age-related etiologies for surgery.
May inform annular sizing in bicuspid aortic valve surgery; leaves open effects on prosthesis selection and outcomes.
Of 413 patients undergoing surgery for aortic valve disease, 42 were confirmed to have congenital bicuspid aortic valve. There were 24 males and 18 females, with a mean age of 54.9 +/- 14.6 years. The etiology of the surgical indications in patients with bicuspid valves were degeneration, rheumatic disease, and infectious endocarditis. Thirty-two patients had aortic stenosis and 10 had aortic regurgitation. Infective endocarditis was seen mainly in patients < or =50 years of age at the time of surgery, while degenerative aortic stenosis occurred more often in older patients. The annular diameter measured during surgery was significantly narrower in the 42 patients with bicuspid valves compared to 371 patients with tricuspid valves who underwent aortic valve replacement during the same period. It is important to prevent infectious endocarditis in younger patients diagnosed with bicuspid aortic valve, whereas careful attention should be paid to decalcification during surgery in older patients because the vast majority suffer from degenerative aortic stenosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ichihara et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: