Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The effects of two factors on the performance of online ocular artifact (OA) removal methods on real electroencephalogram (EEG) data are evaluated. A new metric is proposed that captures both the amount of artifact removed and the likelihood that a given method would distort the underlying EEG. The metric is then used to measure the performance of an existing on-line OA removal algorithm during periods of (i) eye movements and blinks (EM), (ii) a motor related potential (MRP), and (iii) neither EM nor MRP. The results show that the performance of the algorithm is significantly (p<.05) affected by both EM and MRP. Also, the algorithm-like many others-requires a reference electro-oculogram (EOG) signal, yet for certain applications (e.g., a brain computer interface or BCI) it is preferable or necessary to avoid attaching electrodes around the eyes. Thus, the new metric is also used to investigate the effects of using 3 frontal EEG channels as the reference signal instead of EOG. The results show that replacing the EOG with the selected 3 EEG channels does not significantly (p<.05) affect the performance of the algorithm, making it a viable option for online applications where the use of EOG is not suitable (e.g., BCI).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Noureddin et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 7 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: