Why the study?
It is unclear whether the obese phenotype of preserved ejection fraction heart failure reflects the convergence of two conditions or if severe obesity drives heart failure development, and whether metabolic bariatric surgery reverses concentric left ventricular remodeling.
Does metabolic bariatric surgery reverse concentric left ventricular remodeling in patients with severe obesity and preserved ejection fraction heart failure?
Does metabolic bariatric surgery reverse concentric left ventricular remodeling in patients with severe obesity and preserved ejection fraction heart failure?
The obese phenotype of HFpEF presents a unique opportunity to study whether significant weight loss via bariatric surgery can reverse concentric left ventricular remodeling.
Bariatric surgery remains unproven for reversing LV remodeling in obese HFpEF; leaves open a key research opportunity for targeted trials.
Owing to the overwhelming obesity epidemic, preserved ejection fraction heart failure commonly ensues in patients with severe obesity and the obese phenotype of preserved ejection fraction heart failure is now commonplace in clinical practice. Severe obesity and preserved ejection fraction heart failure share congruent cardiovascular, immune, and renal derangements that make it difficult to ascertain whether the obese phenotype of preserved ejection fraction heart failure is the convergence of two highly prevalent conditions or severe obesity enables the development and progression of the syndrome of preserved ejection fraction heart failure. Nevertheless, the obese phenotype of preserved ejection fraction heart failure provides a unique opportunity to assess whether sustained and sizeable loss of excess body weight via metabolic bariatric surgery reverses the concentric left ventricular remodeling that patients with preserved ejection fraction heart failure commonly display.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stencel et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: