Why the study?
Does baseline septal flash or contractile reserve predict echocardiographic and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with HFrEF?
Does baseline septal flash or contractile reserve predict echocardiographic and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with HFrEF?
Baseline septal flash, but not contractile reserve, is a useful predictor of positive left ventricular remodeling after 12 months of cardiac resynchronization therapy, particularly in patients with non-ischemic heart failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support septal flash for predicting post-CRT remodeling in HFrEF; leaves open prospective validation before guiding selection.
Introduction: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been shown to improve outcomes in patients with systolic heart failure (HFREF). However, the relatively high non-responder rate results in a need for more precise qualification for CRT. The ViaCRT study was designed to determine the role of contractile reserve and dyssynchrony parameters in predicting CRT response. The purpose of this analysis was to determine the effect of baseline septal flash and contractile reserve (CR) on clinical and echocardiographic parameters of response to CRT in 12-month follow-up. Material and methods: One hundred thirty-three guideline-selected CRT candidates (both ischemic and non-ischemic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction) were enrolled in the study. Baseline study population characteristics were: left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) 25 6%, QRS 165 25 ms, NYHA class III (90%) and IV (10%). Results: In subjects with septal flash (SF) registered before CRT implantation improvement in LVEF (14 2% vs. 8 1%, p < 0.05) and left ventricle (LV) systolic (63 10 ml vs. 36 6 ml, p < 0.05) and diastolic (46 10 ml vs. 32 7, p < 0.05) volumes was more pronounced than in patients without SF. In patients with CR (defined as LVEF increase by 20% or 4 viable segments) improvement in echo parameters was not significantly different then in the CR-group. Neither SF nor CR was associated with improvement in NYHA class. Subgroup analysis revealed that only in non-ischemic HF patients is presence of septal flash associated with LV function improvement after CRT. Conclusions: In non-ischemic HF patients septal flash is a helpful parameter in prediction of LV remodeling after 12 months of resynchronization therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gąsior et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: