The case study presented is a prime example of integrated geophysical–archaeological prospection. The aerial photographs available are complemented by non‐destructive geomagnetic and geoelectric surveys with a reading distance of 0.5 m or less. To gain depth information and provide higher resolution, ground‐penetrating radar (GPR) data are integrated. The GPR data were collected in a 0.5 × 0.05 m raster and visualized as black‐and‐white time or depth slices. The developments presented allow us to incorporate GPR into the standardized interpretation process of archaeological prospection based on a geographical information system (Grs). Using GPR and all the other prospection data available as a basis, a detailed three‐dimensional interpretation model of the monument detected, the southern part of the forum of the civil town of Roman Carnuntum, is created.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Neubauer et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: