Key result
Fenofibrate reduced visceral adipose tissue mass by 46% and increased vascularization in normolipemic rabbits, whereas atorvastatin increased adipocyte diameter by 65%.
Why the study?
Statins may precipitate type 2 diabetes while fibrates offer cardiovascular benefits in insulin resistance, and prior observations suggested atorvastatin increases visceral adipose tissue whereas fenofibrate does the opposite.
Does atorvastatin or fenofibrate alter the mass, morphology, and vascularization of visceral adipose tissue in New Zealand white rabbits?
Does atorvastatin or fenofibrate alter the mass, morphology, and vascularization of visceral adipose tissue in New Zealand white rabbits?
In a rabbit model, fenofibrate induces favorable remodeling of visceral adipose tissue (reduced mass, increased vascularization), whereas atorvastatin induces unfavorable remodeling (larger adipocytes), potentially explaining their divergent metabolic effects in humans.
Fenofibrate and atorvastatin exert opposing effects on rabbit visceral adipose tissue; hypothesis-generating for human metabolic differences and requires clinical confirmation.
Statins may precipitate the onset of type 2 diabetes (T2D) in high-risk patients. In contrast, only the subset of individuals with insulin resistance and/or diabetes receives cardiovascular benefits with fibrates. In this context, previous observations from our laboratory suggested that atorvastatin induced an increase in visceral adipose tissue (VAT), whereas fenofibrate had the opposite effects in rabbits. Therefore, we determined the mass, morphology, and vascularization of VAT in New Zealand white rabbits (n = 6/group) that received 0.33 or 2.6 mg/kg/d of atorvastatin or fenofibrate, respectively, during 2 months. As expected, the cholesterol from the atorvastatin group was lower after treatment, while triglycerides decreased in the fenofibrate group. The mass of VAT from the fenofibrate group was 46% lower compared to the controls, meanwhile atorvastatin was associated with a larger diameter of adipocytes (+65%) than that of the control and fenofibrate groups. Fibroblast growth factor 2 ( FGF2) gene expression was lower in the fenofibrate group than in the control group (−54%). By contrast, vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) gene expression in fenofibrate-treated rabbits was 110% higher than in the control group. In agreement with the gene expression, the marker of angiogenesis platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1 was slightly but significantly higher (+10%) in rabbits treated with fenofibrate than in controls, as determined by immunohistochemistry. These results suggest that fenofibrate is associated with a favorable remodeling of VAT, that is, reduced mass and increased vascularization in normolipemic rabbits; in contrast, atorvastatin induced a nonfavorable remodeling of VAT. These results may be related to the cardiovascular benefits of fenofibrate and the increased risk of T2D in high-risk patients induced by atorvastatin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mondragón-García et al. (2019) studied Normolipemic rabbits (n=18). Atorvastatin or fenofibrate vs. Control was evaluated on Mass, morphology, and vascularization of visceral adipose tissue (VAT). Fenofibrate reduced visceral adipose tissue mass by 46% and increased vascularization in normolipemic rabbits, whereas atorvastatin increased adipocyte diameter by 65%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: