Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose: This research compares the profitability of state-owned commercial banks in Bangladesh operating under Islamic Profit-Loss Sharing (PLS) principles with conventional interest-based systems. Design/Method/Approach: This study uses a comparative quantitative approach, analyzing 10 years of financial data from state-owned commercial banks in Bangladesh. Profitability indicators (ROA, ROE, NPM, EPS) are compared between Islamic PLS and conventional interest-based operations. Statistical tools like t-tests and panel regression are used to identify significant differences and impacts. Findings: The study finds that state-owned commercial banks in Bangladesh operating under Islamic PLS models generally exhibit more stable but modest profitability than their conventional interest-based counterparts. While Return on Assets (ROA) and Net Profit Margin (NPM) are slightly higher in traditional operations, Islamic banking shows lower volatility and better risk-sharing attributes. The panel regression analysis reveals that the banking model significantly influences profitability, with conventional interest-based systems yielding higher short-term returns, whereas Islamic PLS promotes financial resilience. Originality/Values: This study uniquely compares profitability between Islamic PLS and conventional interest systems within state-owned banks in Bangladesh. It offers policymakers and bank managers valuable insights on optimizing dual banking operations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmad Faisal (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: