Key result
Women hospitalized for CV reasons are ~44% less likely to undergo cardiac interventions than men.
Why the study?
It was unknown whether sex bias when selecting patients for operation contributes to poorer CVD prognosis among women.
Does female sex reduce the likelihood of receiving cardiac interventions in patients admitted for cardiovascular reasons?
Cohort (n=19,960)
Yes
Does female sex reduce the likelihood of receiving cardiac interventions in patients admitted for cardiovascular reasons?
Effect estimate: OR 0.56 (95% CI 0.42-0.75)
Absolute Event Rate: 2.84% vs 6.83%
Women admitted to the hospital for cardiovascular reasons are significantly less likely to undergo cardiac operations or endovascular procedures compared to men, highlighting a persistent sex bias in cardiovascular care.
Women admitted for cardiovascular reasons received fewer interventions; this Level 3 cohort association leaves open bias and requires prospective confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Research suggests that although men have a higher cardiovascular disease (CVD) rate, women with CVD are more likely to experience a poorer prognosis, possibly owing to incorrect diagnosis and poorer treatment. A question not yet addressed is whether some of this inequality could be due to sex bias when selecting patients for operation. METHOD: The participants were from the Scottish Heart Health Extended Cohort who had been admitted to hospital with a cardiovascular diagnosis over the study period. Participants were recruited between 1984 and 1995 and followed up until 2017. Using propensity score nearest neighbour matching, women were matched 1:1 with men on year of birth, year and reason of admission, smoking status, previous cardiovascular disease (CVD), and family history of CVD. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: After matching, 19,960 admissions (50% women) to hospital for cardiac reasons were available for analysis. Women were less likely to have a cardiac intervention, that is (endovascular or surgical revascularisation), after admission for any cardiovascular reason (6.83% of men, 2.84% of women; odds ratio [OR] 0.56; 95% confidence intervals [CIs] 0.42-0.75), or admission for cardiac ischaemia only (11.07% of men; 6.09% of women; OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.37-0.74). The sex difference was more pronounced in the early part of the study but persisted in the latter phase. CONCLUSIONS: In this matched study of cardiovascular admissions to Scottish hospitals, women were less likely to be recommended for a surgical procedure, even when matched with men for common CVD risk factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fitton et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular disease (n=19,960). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on Cardiac intervention (endovascular or surgical revascularisation) after admission for any cardiovascular reason (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.42-0.75). Women admitted to the hospital for any cardiovascular reason were significantly less likely to undergo a cardiac intervention compared to matched men (OR 0.56).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: