U nderstanding of the role of imaging in stroke has quietly moved forward on several fronts in 2005, without any very major breakthroughs. We will highlight articles that illustrate aspects of the continuing debate about the utility of MR and computed tomography (CT) in selecting patients for therapy, assessing outcomes, determining stroke etiology and risk of new events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Warach et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: