Key result
Left atrial appendage morphology, including volume, orifice size, and shape, influences thrombus formation and stroke risk in non-valvular atrial fibrillation, though data remain controversial.
Why the study?
Data regarding the role of left atrial appendage morphology and function in stroke formation are controversial, with no consensus on morphology categories.
Does left atrial appendage morphology and function affect the risk of stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Does left atrial appendage morphology and function affect the risk of stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
LAA morphology and function, such as volume, orifice size, and shape, may play an important role in stroke risk among AF patients, highlighting the need for further studies to clarify controversial findings.
LAA morphology assessment should not yet guide AF stroke risk decisions; leaves open need for prospective validation.
In patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) the risk of stroke is five times higher than in patients with sinus rhythm. Moreover, stroke is likely to be more severe in the AF patient population. Left atrial appendage (LAA) is the most common source of emboli in AF-related stroke. LAA thrombus is present in 15% of AF patients. Therefore, numerous studies aimed to evaluate the role of LAA structure and function in stroke formation. Higher LAA volume and bigger LAA orifice have been reported to be associated with increased risks of stroke. Moreover, not only the size, but also the shape of the LAA influences thrombus formation. The presence of an obvious bend in the proximal part of the dominant LAA lobe, described as chicken wing LAA morphology has been reported to be protective against stroke. However, other studies are not consistent with this finding and there is no consensus about LAA morphology categories. LAA has reservoir, contractile, electric and endocrine functions, that can provide essential information about the risk of clot formation and embolic events. Decreased LAA flow velocity, reflecting lower LAA contractility has been described to be associated with higher stroke risk. All in all, even if the LAA plays an important role in stroke formation, there are controversial literature data, therefore further studies are needed to evaluate the underlying mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zsarnóczay et al. (2021) conducted a review in Non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Left atrial appendage morphology was evaluated on Stroke. Left atrial appendage morphology, including volume, orifice size, and shape, influences thrombus formation and stroke risk in non-valvular atrial fibrillation, though data remain controversial.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: