This article explores models of narrative and story, as practices that can be used to support and develop identity and relationships. Anglo-Western narratives, linked to certain aspects of the Judeo-Christian tradition, tend to be goal directed and to privilege agency and action, which can exclude people whose capacities for self-determination are difficult to ascertain. It is argued that social constructionist models of narrative that emphasize the collaborative and scaffolded nature of the developmental process have more to offer when considering how to tell stories with people whose communication is non-symbolic. Moreover, one can learn from the non-Westernized story practices of indigenous people, which are structured more cyclically and focus as much on the how as the what of storytelling. Such frameworks allow us to explore together how meaning is constructed through story as a dynamic and emergent property. They are congruent with an ethic of social inclusion that focuses on community and interdependency rather than on autonomy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nicola Grove (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: