Key result
Retraining-free ECG identity authentication using blind segmentation outperforms competitors with a ~0.4% equal error rate.
Why the study?
Existing ECG identity authentication methods rely on complex R-wave extraction and segmentation, and frequently require retraining during user enrollment, which strains the computational efficiency of smart devices.
A novel ECG identity authentication method using blind segmentation and avoiding retraining achieves a low Equal Error Rate of 0.40%, simplifying the authentication process for smart devices.
Simplifies ECG authentication for smart devices; leaves open validation in clinical populations.
Recently, electrocardiogram (ECG) signals have garnered significant attention in the field of identity authentication due to its biological uniqueness. For identity authentication, the ECG signals that collected by wearing smart devices need to be determined whether the signal belongs to an enrolled one. Constrained by the computational efficiency of smart devices in practical scenarios, it is essential to reduce the complexity of the method to lower the computational load. To maintain the accuracy of identity authentication, most research efforts rely on both R-wave extraction and segmentation for subsequent authentication. Moreover, many methods constantly require the model to be retrained during the user enrollment stage, leading to performance degradation and waste of training resources. Hence, we propose a simple yet effective ECG identity authentication method that applies blind segmentation and is free from retraining, which greatly simplifies the authentication process. To mitigate the Equal Error Rate (EER) during the verification phase, a combination of AAM-softmax and triplet losses is employed, along with the incorporation of the hard negative mining within batch samples. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method outperforms competitors by a large margin, e.g., achieving 0.40% EER on the large-scale Autonomic dataset.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dong et al. (2024) studied Identity authentication using ECG signals. ECG identity authentication method applying blind segmentation and free from retraining vs. competitors was evaluated on Equal Error Rate (EER). A simple ECG identity authentication method using blind segmentation and free from retraining achieved an Equal Error Rate of 0.40% on the large-scale Autonomic dataset, outperforming competitors.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: