The proposed real-time ECG QRS detection algorithms achieved a sensitivity of up to 99.74% and specificity of 99.65% when tested on the MIT-BIH arrhythmia database.
Abstract Background QRS and ventricular beat detection is a basic procedure for electrocardiogram (ECG) processing and analysis. Large variety of methods have been proposed and used, featuring high percentages of correct detection. Nevertheless, the problem remains open especially with respect to higher detection accuracy in noisy ECGs Methods A real-time detection method is proposed, based on comparison between absolute values of summed differentiated electrocardiograms of one of more ECG leads and adaptive threshold. The threshold combines three parameters: an adaptive slew-rate value, a second value which rises when high-frequency noise occurs, and a third one intended to avoid missing of low amplitude beats. Two algorithms were developed: Algorithm 1 detects at the current beat and Algorithm 2 has an RR interval analysis component in addition. The algorithms are self-adjusting to the thresholds and weighting constants, regardless of resolution and sampling frequency used. They operate with any number L of ECG leads, self-synchronize to QRS or beat slopes and adapt to beat-to-beat intervals. Results The algorithms were tested by an independent expert, thus excluding possible author's influence, using all 48 full-length ECG records of the MIT-BIH arrhythmia database. The results were: sensitivity Se = 99.69 % and specificity Sp = 99.65 % for Algorithm 1 and Se = 99.74 % and Sp = 99.65 % for Algorithm 2. Conclusion The statistical indices are higher than, or comparable to those, cited in the scientific literature.
Ivaylo Christov (Fri,) conducted a other in Arrhythmia (ECG QRS detection) (n=48). Real-time ECG QRS detection algorithms (Algorithm 1 and 2) using combined adaptive threshold vs. Expert annotated beats (MIT-BIH database) was evaluated on Sensitivity and specificity of QRS detection. The proposed real-time ECG QRS detection algorithms achieved a sensitivity of up to 99.74% and specificity of 99.65% when tested on the MIT-BIH arrhythmia database.