Interest in generic preference-based health-related quality-of-life measures has grown considerably in recent years. Given the availability of several different measures, there is a question over the extent to which different measures produce different results. To determine the interchangeability between measures, a number of head-to-head comparisons have been undertaken to assess levels of agreement or association. However, the assessment of interchangeability may be addressed using a number of different methods. This paper reviews the methods that have been employed to examine the degree of interchangeability between the Assessment of Quality of Life, EuroQol-5D, Health Utilities Index Mark III, Short-Form-6D, Quality of Wellbeing and 15-dimension measures. It suggests a need to develop alternative econometric strategies and to explore, more fully, economic concepts of validity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McNamee et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: