The Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) has been widely hailed by mental health practitioners and others as a source of psychological healing. In this article we consider this claim and its relevance to clinical practice. Recent research in anthropology and related disciplines in South Africa and elsewhere raises questions about the cultural construction of traumatic memory and healing. We argue that these questions have bearing on how we understand the role of mental health practitioners and mental health institutions in the post-TRC period. Case material is be used to illustrate our view that it is important to distinguish between individual and collective healing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Swartz et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: