Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: C-reactive protein, a nonspecific marker of inflammation, has recently been proposed both as a marker of low-grade inflammation involved in atherogenesis and as a predictor of disease progression. RECENT FINDINGS: The physiologic functions of C-reactive protein as an anti-inflammatory scavenger molecule have begun to emerge. For example, C-reactive protein binds to damaged lipoproteins and facilitates their removal by phagocytes without full complement activation. Increased levels of C-reactive protein may result in direct effects on vascular cells, including induction of cytokines and prothrombotic factors. Several sources of biologic variation in the levels of C-reactive protein have been identified, chief among which are abdominal obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Although previous studies showed a potent independent association of C-reactive protein levels with cardiac events, the strength of association was shown to be much weaker than previously reported in recent large meta-analyses. Therapy with nonspecific anti-inflammatory agents such as statins in patients with coronary artery disease has been found to reduce adverse outcomes in association with reductions in C-reactive protein, on the basis of retrospective analysis of stored blood specimens. SUMMARY: Despite a relatively strong epidemiologic association with future adverse cardiovascular events, the great majority of apparently healthy individuals with elevated C-reactive protein will not experience cardiovascular disease. Even though more than 15 000 articles in PubMed mention C-reactive protein, current knowledge is insufficient to implicate C-reactive protein as a causative factor in atherothrombosis or to enable the recommendation of C-reactive protein testing to guide preventive or therapeutic interventions in cardiovascular diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sepulveda et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: