Key result
Higher HRV is linked to ~19% lower odds of poor physical quality of life.
Why the study?
Autonomic dysfunction is thought to be a biological mechanism underlying how self-rated health predicts mortality, but this had not been investigated in the general population.
Does heart rate variability associate with health-related quality of life in the general Japanese population?
Cross-Sectional (n=5,908)
Yes
Does heart rate variability associate with health-related quality of life in the general Japanese population?
Reduced parasympathetic modulation as measured by heart rate variability is nonlinearly associated with poorer physical health-related quality of life in the general population.
Lower HRV may flag poorer physical HRQOL in general populations; leaves open causality and needs prospective confirmation.
Self-rated health predicts mortality. Autonomic dysfunction is thought to be a relevant biological mechanism but has not been investigated in the general population. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 5,908 Japanese men and women aged 30-79 years old. As an autonomic function, heart rate variability (HRV) was assessed using five minute-recordings of pulse waves with a fingertip sensor, and the time and frequency domains of HRV were determined. Health-rated quality of life (HRQOL) was assessed by using the Short Form-8 Japanese version, and poor HRQOL was defined as <50 scores of sub-scales. A test for nonlinear trends was performed in the generalized additive model with the smoothing spline adjusted for confounders. The impact on poor physical component score increased in those who had lower levels of the standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN) and the root mean square of successive difference (RMSSD), and the high frequency (HF) power and tended slightly upward in the higher levels as well. HRV parameters were nonlinearly associated with poor physical component. Reduced SDNN, RMSSD, and HF, which reflect parasympathetic modulations, were associated with poor HRQOL in the domain of physical function. Also, higher levels of these did not necessarily translate into better HRQOL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saito et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in General population (n=5,908). Heart rate variability (HRV) vs. Lowest quartile of HRV parameters was evaluated on Poor physical component score (PCS) (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.70-0.94, p=<0.001). Lower levels of heart rate variability parameters, including SDNN, RMSSD, and HF, were nonlinearly associated with poor physical component scores of health-related quality of life.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: