Is oral health‐related quality of life stable following rehabilitation with mandibular two‐implant overdentures?

OBJECTIVES: The superiority of mandibular two-implant overdentures (IODs) over conventional complete dentures (CDs) in terms of quality of life is still questioned. Furthermore, the stability and magnitude of the treatment effect over time remain uncertain. This follow-up study aimed to determine the stability and magnitude of the effect of IODs on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). MATERIAL AND METHODS: 172 participants (mean age 71 ± 4.5 years) randomly received CDs or IODs, both opposed by conventional maxillary dentures. OHRQoL was measured using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-20) at baseline, 1 and 2 years post-treatment. Repeated measures ANOVAs were conducted to assess the effects of time and treatment on the total OHIP and its individual domain scores. RESULTS: A statistically significant improvement in OHRQoL was seen for both treatment groups (P < 0.001). This improvement was maintained over the 2 year assessment. At both follow-ups, participants wearing IODs reported significantly better total OHIP scores than those wearing CDs (P < 0.001), with a 1.5 times larger magnitude of effect. In the CD group, baseline OHIP scores influenced the post-treatment scores (P < 0.001). This effect was not found in the IOD group. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of mandibular two-IODs on OHRQoL is stable over a 2-year period. The large magnitude of effect of this treatment supports its clinical significance.