Key result
iSMART intervention shows no benefit over standard education for post-stroke function and participation outcomes.
Why the study?
Does a 12-week iSMART intervention improve treatment satisfaction, user experiences, and post-stroke functioning in individuals with mild-to-moderate chronic stroke?
RCT (n=24)
nonblinded
parallel, 2-arm
Does a 12-week iSMART intervention improve treatment satisfaction, user experiences, and post-stroke functioning in individuals with mild-to-moderate chronic stroke?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A 12-week technology-supported self-management intervention (iSMART) provides initial evidence of supporting stroke survivors in managing chronic conditions and enhancing post-stroke functioning.
BACKGROUND: Self-management interventions empower individuals to manage their chronic conditions and daily life after stroke. However, traditional in-person self-management interventions often face transportation and geographical barriers. Digital interventions may offer a solution to address this gap. OBJECTIVES: This pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed to examine treatment satisfaction, user experiences, and the initial effect of the interactive Self-Management Augmented by Rehabilitation Technologies (iSMART) intervention in stroke survivors to improve post-stroke functioning. METHODS: = 24) with mild-to-moderate chronic stroke completed a parallel, 2-arm, nonblinded, remote RCT. They were randomly assigned to either a 12-week iSMART or a control intervention (post-stroke information). iSMART was a technology-based self-management intervention involving skill-building education, human coaching, and text messaging. Participants completed a battery measuring treatment satisfaction, use experiences, and function and participation outcomes at baseline and post-intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide initial evidence that iSMART supports stroke survivors in managing chronic conditions and enhancing post-stroke functioning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lei et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in mild-to-moderate chronic stroke (n=24). interactive Self-Management Augmented by Rehabilitation Technologies (iSMART) vs. control intervention (post-stroke information) was evaluated on treatment satisfaction, use experiences, and function and participation outcomes (p=0.545). The 12-week iSMART intervention provided initial evidence for supporting stroke survivors in managing chronic conditions and enhancing post-stroke functioning (P=0.545).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: