Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
I provide sample size formulae and tables for the design of studies that compare two or more coefficients of inter-observer agreement or concordance. Such studies may arise, for example, when interest centres on assessment of how measures of inter-observer agreement vary across different patient subgroups or treatment centres. I consider cases of both a continuous and a dichotomous outcome measure. Three examples illustrate the results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Allan Donner (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: