Key result
Self-reported anthropometric measures, including BMI and waist circumference, were highly correlated with measured values (r=0.98 and r=0.88) and showed similar associations with cardiometabolic biomarkers.
Why the study?
Misreporting of height and weight may bias estimated associations with health outcomes, and few validation studies have compared self-reported and measured waist circumference.
Are self-reported anthropometric measures reliable for estimating associations with cardiometabolic biomarkers compared to measured anthropometrics?
Cohort (n=39,514)
Yes
Are self-reported anthropometric measures reliable for estimating associations with cardiometabolic biomarkers compared to measured anthropometrics?
Self-reported anthropometric measures are highly concordant with measured values and are reliable for estimating associations with cardiometabolic biomarkers in epidemiological studies.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Self-reported anthropometrics may suffice for population biomarker studies; extends validity of prior cohort data using self-reports.
Self-reported measures of height and weight are widely used in epidemiological studies. However, misreporting may bias estimates of associations between anthropometry and health outcomes. Further, few validation studies have compared self-reported and measured waist circumference (WC). This study aimed to quantify the agreement between self-reported and measured height, weight, body mass index (BMI), WC, and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), and to investigate associations of these anthropometric measures with cardiometabolic biomarkers. Self-reported and measured anthropometric variables, as well as cardiometabolic biomarkers, were obtained from participants aged above 18 years at recruitment into the Diet, Cancer, and Health-Next Generation Cohort in 2015-19 (N=39,514). Pearson correlations ( r ) and Lin’s concordance correlations were applied to evaluate misreporting. Misreporting by age, sex and smoking status was investigated in linear regression models. Multivariable regression models and Receiver Operating Characteristic analyses assessed associations of self-reported and measured anthropometry with cardiometabolic biomarkers. Self-reported height was overreported by 1.07 cm, and weight was underreported by 0.32 kg on average. Self-reported BMI and WC were 0.42 kg/m 2 and 0.2 cm lower than measured, respectively. Self-reported and measured height, weight, BMI, WC and WtHR were strongly correlated ( r =0.98, 0.99, 0.98, 0.88, 0.86, respectively). Age, sex, smoking, and BMI contributed to misreporting of all anthropometric measures. Associations between self-reported or measured anthropometric measures and cardiometabolic biomarkers were similar in direction and strength. Concordance between self-reported and measured anthropometric measures, including WC, was very high. Self-reported anthropometric measures were reliable when estimating associations with cardiometabolic biomarkers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Healthy adults (n=39,514). Self-reported anthropometric measurements vs. Clinically measured anthropometric measurements was evaluated on Correlation between self-reported and measured BMI (r=0.98). Self-reported anthropometric measures, including BMI and waist circumference, were highly correlated with measured values (r=0.98 and r=0.88) and showed similar associations with cardiometabolic biomarkers.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: