Key result
In a simulated left heart model, high left ventricular diastolic stiffness required 6.6 times more stroke work to compensate for lost volume due to acute aortic regurgitation.
Why the study?
Does acute aortic regurgitation severity affect left ventricular performance in the presence of varying left ventricular diastolic stiffness?
Does acute aortic regurgitation severity affect left ventricular performance in the presence of varying left ventricular diastolic stiffness?
Left ventricular diastolic stiffness significantly exacerbates the hemodynamic burden of acute aortic regurgitation, suggesting LVDS assessment could predict tolerance to post-TAVR AR.
High LV diastolic stiffness exacerbates acute AR burden in models; hypothesis-generating for LVDS predicting post-TAVR AR tolerance.
Acute aortic regurgitation (AR) post-chronic aortic stenosis is a prevalent phenomenon occurring in patients who undergo transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) surgery. The objective of this work was to characterize the effects of left ventricular diastolic stiffness (LVDS) and AR severity on LV performance. Three LVDS models were inserted into a physiological left heart simulator. AR severity was parametrically varied through four levels (ranging from trace to moderate) and compared with a competent aortic valve. Hemodynamic metrics such as average diastolic pressures (DP) and reduction in transmitral flow were measured. AR index was calculated as a function of AR severity and LVDS, and the work required to make up for lost volume due to AR was estimated. In the presence of trace AR, higher LVDS had up to a threefold reduction in transmitral flow (13% compared with 3.5%) and a significant increase in DP (2-fold). The AR index ranged from ∼42 to 16 (no AR to moderate AR), with stiffer LVs having lower values. To compensate for lost volume due to AR, the low, medium, and high LVDS models were found to require 5.1, 5.5, and 6.6 times more work, respectively. This work shows that the LVDS has a significant effect on the LV performance in the presence of AR. Therefore, the LVDS of potential TAVR patients should be assessed to gain an initial indication of their ability to tolerate post-procedural AR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Okafor et al. (2016) studied Acute aortic regurgitation post-chronic aortic stenosis. Varying levels of left ventricular diastolic stiffness (LVDS) and aortic regurgitation (AR) severity vs. Competent aortic valve (no AR) and low LVDS was evaluated on Additional stroke work required to compensate for lost volume due to AR. In a simulated left heart model, high left ventricular diastolic stiffness required 6.6 times more stroke work to compensate for lost volume due to acute aortic regurgitation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: