Examines the impact of high-frequency simulation on clinical competence in paramedicine, highlighting significant improvements in exam performance.
Background: Clinical competence is essential for paramedicine graduates, who must make rapid, high-stakes decisions in unpredictable environments. Ensuring students reach a practice-ready standard requires structured, evidence-informed assessment strategies. Although simulation-based education is widely used, few studies have explored how high-frequency simulation combined with structured performance-based assessment (PBA) tracking supports competence development over time. Aim: The aim was to determine the effect of high-frequency simulation with structured formative assessment on developing simulation-based clinical competence and summative practical exam outcomes in paramedicine education. Methods: This secondary analysis examined 2024 performance data from 2 undergraduate paramedicine courses at Griffith University. High-frequency simulation was combined with graded formative PBAs to support competence development. Weekly simulations were assessed using the Clinical Competence Assessment Tool (CCAT), providing real-time grading and structured feedback. Associations between formative performance and summative practical exam outcomes were analyzed using paired t tests, mixed ANOVA, and hierarchical regression. Ethics approval was granted (GUHREC: 2024/073). Results: Students completed an average of 4.6 simulations (SD=1.4 and 1.7), with 222 simulations recorded in second year (n=48) and 187 in third year (n=41). Both cohorts showed significant improvement in mean practice scores over time, with higher final exam scores observed ( P <0.05). Practice frequency had incremental effects on performance over time ( P <0.05) and was an independent predictor of exam outcome (B=3.46, P <0.05). Conclusions: High-frequency simulation with structured PBA tracking significantly improves competence and exam performance. This scalable formative strategy supports accreditation standards in paramedicine education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Veronese et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: