This article has 3 objectives that build on each other. First, we demonstrate how to obtain maximum likelihood estimates for dynamic factor models (the direct autoregressive factor score model) with arbitrary T and N by means of structural equation modeling (SEM) and compare the approach to existing methods. Second, we go beyond standard time series analysis (T large and N = 1) and conventional SEM (N large and T = 1 or small) by integrating both approaches. The resulting combined model offers a variety of new modeling options including a direct test of the ergodicity hypothesis, according to which the factorial structure of an individual observed at many time points is identical to the factorial structure of a group of individuals observed at a single point in time. Third, we illustrate the flexibility of SEM time series modeling by extending the approach to account for complex error structures. We end with a discussion of current limitations and future applications of SEM-based time series modeling for arbitrary T and N. Keywords: dynamic factor analysisfactorial invariancemaximum likelihood estimationtime series analysis Notes 1More generally speaking, S is singular; that is, |S| cannot be computed, as long as the number of independent cases is smaller than the number of time points multiplied by the number of observed variables (i.e., N < Tq). aReproduced with permission. bResults are based on 90 replications. cResults are based on 97 replications. 2For a comparison to the three other estimation techniques, the reader is referred to Table 2 to Table 4 in CitationZhang et al. (2008). 3Of course, the approach also permits covariances among measurement errors within each time point. 4Another potential advantage of the simultaneous estimation of between- and within-person models might be an improved initializing of the individual time series by borrowing information on the between-person model at the first time point. This remains to be explored in future research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Voelkle et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: