Key result
Left bundle branch area pacing resulted in a median right ventricular activation time of 84 ms, which was longer than incomplete RBBB (74 ms) but significantly shorter than complete RBBB (96 ms).
Why the study?
Although LBBAP induces delayed RV activation thought to be harmless due to resemblance to native RBBB, the extent to which this activation delay truly resembles native RBBB remained unexplored.
Does LBBAP-induced delayed RV activation electrocardiographically resemble native incomplete or complete RBBB?
Cross-Sectional (n=731)
No
Does LBBAP-induced delayed RV activation electrocardiographically resemble native incomplete or complete RBBB?
LBBAP-induced delayed right ventricular activation electrocardiographically mirrors incomplete rather than complete RBBB, suggesting a more physiological RV activation than purely myocardial conduction.
LBBAP RV activation time intermediate between iRBBB and cRBBB; hypothesis-generating for physiological pacing effects, needs prospective validation.
Background Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) induces delayed RV activation and is thought to be harmless, since the electrocardiographic signature is reminiscent to native RBBB. However, to what extent the delayed RV activation during LBBAP truly resembles that of native RBBB remains unexplored. Methods This study included patients with incomplete RBBB (iRBBB), complete RBBB (cRBBB) and patients who underwent LBBAP. Global and right ventricular activation times were estimated by QRS duration and R wave peak time in lead V1 (V1RWPT) respectively. Delayed RV activation was further characterized by duration, amplitude and area of the terminal R wave in V1. Results In patients with LBBAP ( n = 86), QRS duration [120 ms (116, 132)] was longer compared to iRBBB patients ( n = 422): 104 ms (98, 110), p < 0.001, but shorter compared to cRBBB ( n = 223): 138 ms (130, 152), p < 0.001. V1RWPT during LBBAP [84 ms (72, 92)] was longer compared to iRBBB [74 ms (68, 80), p < 0.001], but shorter than cRBBB [96 ms (86, 108), p < 0.001]. LBBAP resulted in V1 R′ durations [42 ms (28, 55)] comparable to iRBBB [42 ms (35, 49), p = 0.49] but shorter than in cRBBB [81 ms (68, 91), p < 0.001]. During LBBAP, the amplitude and area of the V1 R′ wave were more comparable with iRBBB than cRBBB. V1RWPT during LBBAP was determined by baseline conduction disease, but not by LBBAP capture type. Conclusion LBBAP-induced delayed RV activation electrocardiographically most closely mirrors the delayed RV activation as seen with incomplete rather than complete RBBB.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Özpak et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Right bundle branch block and left bundle branch area pacing (n=731). Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) vs. Incomplete RBBB (iRBBB) and complete RBBB (cRBBB) was evaluated on Right ventricular activation time (V1RWPT) in ms (p=<0.001). Left bundle branch area pacing resulted in a median right ventricular activation time of 84 ms, which was longer than incomplete RBBB (74 ms) but significantly shorter than complete RBBB (96 ms).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: