Why the study?
Do radionuclide ventriculography and thallium-201 perfusion imaging reliably distinguish ischemic from nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy?
Do radionuclide ventriculography and thallium-201 perfusion imaging reliably distinguish ischemic from nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy?
Radionuclide ventriculography and thallium perfusion imaging are unreliable for differentiating ischemic from nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy because abnormalities traditionally considered ischemic are highly prevalent in nonischemic patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
These imaging abnormalities caution against using radionuclide tests to differentiate cardiomyopathy etiologies; challenges consensus on their ischemic specificity.
BACKGROUND: Clinically, ischemic and nonischemic (idiopathic) dilated cardiomyopathy may be difficult to distinguish. Radionuclide ventriculography and exercise testing with thallium-201 scintigraphy are often used in an attempt to differentiate them noninvasively. With these techniques, the presence of (1) left ventricular (LV) regional asynergy, (2) depressed LV systolic function with normal right ventricular function, and/or (3) thallium-201 perfusion abnormalities traditionally has been regarded as evidence of ischemic heart disease. We assessed the incidence with which these abnormalities occur in patients with nonischemic-dilated cardiomyopathy. METHODS: Seventy-six patients (45 men, 31 women, aged 18 to 75 years) with invasively proven nonischemic-dilated cardiomyopathy underwent radionuclide ventriculography (n = 75) and provocative thallium-201 perfusion imaging (n = 17). RESULTS: Regional LV wall motion abnormalities were noted in 48% of patients, and 54% had LV systolic dysfunction without concomitant right ventricular dysfunction. Reversible and/or fixed exercise-induced thallium-201 perfusion abnormalities occurred in 94% of the patients studied. CONCLUSIONS: Radionuclide ventriculography and exercise testing with thallium perfusion imaging cannot be used reliably to differentiate ischemic from nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, since many patients with the latter have radionuclide evidence of LV segmental wall motion abnormalities, selective LV systolic dysfunction, and segmental perfusion abnormalities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D.Brent Glamann (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: