Why the study?
Does a floating-axis system correct for abnormal postoperative septal motion seen in a fixed-axis system in patients who underwent cardiac surgery?
Does a floating-axis system correct for abnormal postoperative septal motion seen in a fixed-axis system in patients who underwent cardiac surgery?
Systolic translation of the ventricle accounts for abnormal postoperative septal motion seen in fixed-axis systems, which can be corrected by using a floating-axis system in two-dimensional echocardiography.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Floating-axis systems may avoid misinterpreting postoperative septal motion as dysfunction; extends prior observations from radionuclide ventriculography to echocardiography.
Septal and lateral wall motion and septal thickening were evaluated with quantitative two-dimensional echocardiography in 20 patients who underwent cardiac surgery without complications. Postoperative mean ejection fraction (48 +/- 10%) measured by radionuclide ventriculography was unchanged from the preoperative value (45 +/- 8%). Mean postoperative systolic thickening of the septum (33 +/- 15%) was also unchanged from the preoperative value (26 +/- 10%). However, septal endocardial motion as measured by an external frame-of-reference (fixed-axis) system fell from a 22 +/- 10% mean percent shortening (MPS) of septal radii to a postoperative value of -8 +/- 15% (p less than .001). Fixed-axis analysis also led to an increase in MPS of lateral radii: preoperative 16 +/- 5%; postoperative 28 +/- 9% (p less than .001). With an internal frame-of-reference (floating-axis) system, which compensates for the effects of translation and rotation on wall motion, postoperative MPS of septal radii (22 +/- 10%) was unchanged from preoperative MPS (25 +/- 8%; p = NS). Similarly, MPS of lateral wall radii was unchanged (preoperative, 15 +/- 5%; postoperative, 12 +/- 5%; p = NS). Thus systolic translation of the ventricle accounts for abnormal postoperative septal motion seen in a fixed-axis system and can be corrected by a floating-axis system. These data have important implications for the noninvasive evaluation of regional wall motion after cardiac surgery. Systems using a fixed external frame of reference such as radionuclide ventriculography are prone to systematic error. A combination of systolic thickening analysis by two-dimensional echocardiography and analysis of endocardial motion by the floating-axis system is a more appropriate method for evaluating the effects of cardiac surgery on regional left ventricular function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Force et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: