Hospital discharge planning was most strongly associated with reduced readmissions, fewer medication discrepancies, and greater patient satisfaction, particularly with high-intensity bundled programs.
Systematic Review (n=34)
Do hospital discharge planning interventions improve clinical and patient-reported outcomes?
High-intensity, bundled hospital discharge planning programs incorporating medication interventions and follow-ups are effective at reducing readmissions and medication discrepancies while improving patient satisfaction.
OBJECTIVE: To provide a comprehensive overview of the different types of hospital discharge planning (DP) interventions and outcomes examined in systematic reviews, and to assess the strength of evidence (SoE) for the associations between DP and these outcomes. STUDY SETTING AND DESIGN: Umbrella review ("review of systematic reviews"). DATA SOURCES: We searched five databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Business Source Complete) from inception through February 2024 for systematic reviews examining associations between hospital DP and various outcomes. We conducted backward and forward citation searches to identify additional systematic reviews. Altogether, these searches yielded 1817 records, of which 34 met the inclusion criteria. We assessed the methodological quality of the included reviews using the AMSTAR 2 tool, summarized DP intervention types and the reviews' subgroup analyses narratively, and evaluated the SoE for 19 outcomes using a recently developed method. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We identified 20 distinct DP intervention types which we grouped into six intervention categories. Patient education was the most frequently investigated type. We rated SoE as high for five outcomes, moderate for eight, and low for six. We found the strongest evidence for associations between hospital DP and reduced readmissions, fewer medication discrepancies, and greater patient satisfaction. Evidence for associations with quality of life, emergency department visits, mortality, and overall patient health, however, was weak or lacking. Our synthesis of the reviews' subgroup analyses indicated that the effects of hospital DP varied across patient populations and intervention types. Overall, the most effective interventions appeared to be high-intensity, bundled programs, incorporating medication-related interventions and follow-ups, particularly for reducing readmissions. CONCLUSION: This umbrella review synthesizes evidence on associations between hospital DP and various outcomes. The findings support the development of tailored DP strategies and point to research gaps. Future studies should prioritize standardizing intervention definitions, outcome measures, and subgroup classifications, and investigate unexamined causal mechanisms.
Imhof et al. (Thu,) conducted a systematic review in Hospital discharge (n=34). Hospital discharge planning was evaluated on Strength of evidence for associations between discharge planning and 19 outcomes. Hospital discharge planning was most strongly associated with reduced readmissions, fewer medication discrepancies, and greater patient satisfaction, particularly with high-intensity bundled programs.