Key result
The COACH transitional pharmaceutical care program did not significantly reduce unplanned rehospitalisations within six months post-discharge compared to usual care (change in trend -0.2%).
Why the study?
Medication errors during transitions of care can adversely affect patient safety, prompting the evaluation of a transitional pharmaceutical care program on unplanned rehospitalisations.
Does a transitional pharmaceutical care program reduce unplanned rehospitalisations in internal medicine patients on chronic prescription drugs?
Observational (n=706)
No
Does a transitional pharmaceutical care program reduce unplanned rehospitalisations in internal medicine patients on chronic prescription drugs?
A transitional pharmaceutical care program did not significantly reduce unplanned rehospitalisations at 6 months in internal medicine patients, likely because rehospitalisation causes are multifactorial.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Transitional care did not reduce rehospitalisations in this cohort; hypothesis-generating for multifactorial interventions in internal medicine patients.
BACKGROUND: Medication errors at transition of care can adversely affect patient safety. The objective of this study is to determine the effect of a transitional pharmaceutical care program on unplanned rehospitalisations. METHODS: An interrupted-time-series study was performed, including patients from the Internal Medicine department using at least one prescription drug. The program consisted of medication reconciliation, patient counselling at discharge, and communication to healthcare providers in primary care. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with an unplanned rehospitalisation within six months post-discharge. Secondary outcomes were drug-related hospital visits, drug-related problems (DRPs), adherence, believes about medication, and patient satisfaction. Interrupted time series analysis was used for the primary outcome and descriptive statistics were performed for the secondary outcomes. RESULTS: In total 706 patients were included. At 6 months, the change in trend for unplanned rehospitalisations between usual care and the program group was non-significant (- 0.2, 95% CI -4.9;4.6). There was no significant difference for drug-related visits although visits due to medication reconciliation problems occurred less often (4 usual care versus 1 intervention). Interventions to prevent DRPs were present for all patients in the intervention group (mean: 10 interventions/patient). No effect was seen on adherence and beliefs about medication. Patients were significantly more satisfied with discharge counselling (68.9% usual care vs 87.1% program). CONCLUSIONS: The transitional pharmaceutical care program showed no effect on unplanned rehospitalisations. This lack of effect is probably because the reason for rehospitalisations are multifactorial while the transitional care program focused on medication. There were less hospital visits due to medication reconciliation problems, but further large scale studies are needed due to the small number of drug-related visits. (Dutch trial register: NTR1519).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karapinar‐Çarkit et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Internal medicine patients using at least one prescription drug (n=706). COACH program (transitional pharmaceutical care) vs. Usual care was evaluated on Proportion of patients with at least one unplanned rehospitalisation within six months after discharge (Change in trend -0.2%, 95% CI -4.9; 4.6). The COACH transitional pharmaceutical care program did not significantly reduce unplanned rehospitalisations within six months post-discharge compared to usual care (change in trend -0.2%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: