Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Jacob Belzen's call for a cultural psychology of religion is much appreciated and this comment expresses considerable sympathy for most of his arguments. However, in order to facilitate a broad appreciation of Belzen's book, the focus is upon five areas in which critiques seem most appropriate. These five critiques are offered to engage Belzen in a dialogue concerning what is a significant book that raises important issues for the psychology of religion which has been admittedly blind to the cultural possibilities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ralph W. Hood (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: