Key result
The Cardiac Depression Visual Analogue Scale demonstrated adequate internal reliability (α = 0.76) and strong concurrent validity with the Cardiac Depression Scale (r = 0.89).
Why the study?
Is the Cardiac Depression Visual Analogue Scale (CDVAS) a valid and reliable measure of depressive symptoms in a general and medical sample?
Cross-Sectional (n=117)
Is the Cardiac Depression Visual Analogue Scale (CDVAS) a valid and reliable measure of depressive symptoms in a general and medical sample?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The Cardiac Depression Visual Analogue Scale is a valid, reliable, and brief tool for assessing depressive symptoms in both general and medical populations.
Comorbid depression and medical illness is associated with a number of adverse health outcomes such as lower medication adherence and higher rates of subsequent mortality. Reliable and valid psychological measures capable of detecting a range of depressive symptoms found in medical settings are needed. The Cardiac Depression Visual Analogue Scale (CDVAS) is a recently developed, brief six-item measure originally designed to assess the range and severity of depressive symptoms within a cardiac population. The current study aimed to further investigate the psychometric properties of the CDVAS in a general and medical sample. The sample consisted of 117 participants, whose mean age was 40.0 years (SD = 19.0, range 18-84). Participants completed the CDVAS, the Cardiac Depression Scale (CDS), the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) and a demographic and health questionnaire. The CDVAS was found to have adequate internal reliability (α = .76), strong concurrent validity with the CDS (r = .89) and the depression sub-scale of the DASS (r = .70), strong discriminant validity and strong predictive validity. The principal components analysis revealed that the CDVAS measured only one component, providing further support for the construct validity of the scale. Results of the current study indicate that the CDVAS is a short, simple, valid and reliable measure of depressive symptoms suitable for use in a general and medical sample.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Benedetto et al. (2013) conducted a cross-sectional in Depressive symptoms (n=117). Cardiac Depression Visual Analogue Scale (CDVAS) vs. Cardiac Depression Scale (CDS) and Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) was evaluated on Psychometric properties including internal reliability and concurrent validity (r 0.89). The Cardiac Depression Visual Analogue Scale demonstrated adequate internal reliability (α = 0.76) and strong concurrent validity with the Cardiac Depression Scale (r = 0.89).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: