PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 6, 2019Current Opinion in Neurology40 citations

Atrial fibrillation and stroke: how much atrial fibrillation is enough to cause a stroke?

View Full Paper
Jeff S. Healey
Jeff S. HealeyElectrophysiology
GAGuy AmitBen-Gurion University of the NegevTFThalia S. FieldUniversity of British Columbia

Key Result

Subclinical atrial fibrillation increases stroke risk alongside its burden, but whether durations of 24 hours or less necessitate lifelong anticoagulation remains to be clarified by ongoing trials.

Structured PICO

Does anticoagulation prevent stroke in patients with subclinical atrial fibrillation or ESUS?

P
Population
Patients with subclinical atrial fibrillation or embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS)
I
Intervention
Anticoagulation
C
Comparator
Antiplatelet agents or no anticoagulation
O
Outcome
Strokehard clinical

While stroke risk increases with atrial fibrillation burden, the exact threshold of subclinical AF requiring anticoagulation remains unknown and is the subject of ongoing clinical trials.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The association between atrial fibrillation and stroke is firmly established, and anticoagulation reduces stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, the role of anticoagulation in very brief durations of atrial fibrillation (subclinical atrial fibrillation) is an area of controversy. RECENT FINDINGS: Stroke risk increases alongside burden of atrial fibrillation. Ongoing trials will clarify if 24 h or less of atrial fibrillation on extended monitoring necessitates lifelong anticoagulation. Trials examining empiric anticoagulation for individuals with ESUS did not demonstrate benefit over antiplatelet agents. However, hypothesis-generating sub-analyses suggest that certain at-risk groups may benefit. Atrial cardiopathy is associated with subclinical atrial fibrillation and research examining anticoagulation after ESUS in this population is underway. SUMMARY: Stroke risk increases alongside burden of ectopic atrial activity. However, this risk may in part be because of prothrombotic dysfunction associated with atrial cardiopathy in addition to the arrhythmia itself. The minimal amount of subclinical atrial fibrillation to warrant anticoagulation for stroke prevention, and how this may be modified by the total duration of monitoring, will be clarified by the results of ongoing clinical trials. Currently research will also help identify whether a select group of ESUS patients who have structural and electrophysiological markers of atrial cardiopathy warrant anticoagulation for secondary prevention.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Healey et al. (2019) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation and stroke. Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet agents was evaluated. Subclinical atrial fibrillation increases stroke risk alongside its burden, but whether durations of 24 hours or less necessitate lifelong anticoagulation remains to be clarified by ongoing trials.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1b032fe916fa6dd3b93a19https://doi.org/10.1097/wco.0000000000000780
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1How Much Atrial Fibrillation is Enough to Warrant Oral Anticoagulation: Management of Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation?2018
  2. 2Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation: To Anticoagulate or Not?2024 · 2 citations
  3. 3Subclinical atrial fibrillation - what is the risk of stroke?2019 · 8 citations
  4. 4Stroke Prevention for Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Beyond the Guidelines2017 · 42 citations
  5. 52021 Korean Heart Rhythm Society Guidelines for Screening and Management of Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation2021 · 1 citations