The effectiveness of a method to strengthen/repair unreinforced masonry (URM) by using timber-based products was investigated through experimental in situ testing. The strategy consists of timber-based panels connected to the masonry by means of screw fasteners. URM piers obtained from a century-old building were subjected to in-plane semi-cyclic quasi-static loading in as-built, repaired and retrofitted configurations. The application of the reinforcement on previously damaged piers led to a notable increase in the in-plane capacity while the initial stiffness of the repaired specimens was found to be consistent with that of the specimens tested as-built. When applied to undamaged masonry, the retrofit system allowed an in-plane force 40% higher than the capacity of the unreinforced walls, with the initial stiffness comparable with that of the repaired specimens. Both repaired and retrofitted specimens exhibited remarkable displacement capacity (drift levels > 2.0%) and energy dissipation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giongo et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: