Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
According to an adequacy-for-purpose view, models should be assessed with respect to their adequacy or fitness for particular purposes. Such a view has been advocated by scientists and philosophers alike. Important details, however, have yet to be spelled out. This article attempts to make progress by addressing three key questions: What does it mean for a model to be adequate-for-purpose? What makes a model adequate-for-purpose? How does assessing a model’s adequacy-for-purpose differ from assessing its representational accuracy? In addition, responses are given to some objections that might be raised against an adequacy-for-purpose view.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wendy S. Parker (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: