Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: In recent years, surgical training has undergone considerable change and COVID-19 has accelerated the rate at which training methods have needed to be updated. Education of surgical trainees is now transitioning from that of a clinical setting to that of a simulated skills laboratory. This article aims to outline the importance of ensuring equitable access to high-fidelity surgical training equipment and to bring to attention the potential consequences of nonstandardized surgical simulation exposure. Methods: Data collection was performed using the PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE and Embase bibliographical databases with a predefined search strategy between 11 February 2021 and 1 June 2021. All articles considering surgical education via simulation technologies were considered. Results: Twentyeight studies were deemed eligible for inclusion in a qualitative synthesis. Despite the increasing popularity of simulation, simulation-guided learning has yet to become fully integrated within all curricula, and the use of these technologies is yet to be adequately evaluated in a post-pandemic context. Therefore, there is a need to educate and inform medical students and surgical trainees, who will all be required to learn from and be assessed on simulated clinical technologies. Conclusions: Surgical training methods must be consistently updated so that they reflect the transitioning cultural, social-economic, and political expectations and restraints on surgical curricula. Continual development of simulation facilities is required to ensure sustainable integration within surgical training. Equitable access for all trainees must be a future point of focus if surgical training is to continue at its current level.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taylor et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: