Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The rapid emergence of open-access generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has sparked a heated debate with polarising views on whether or not it is ethical to use GenAI for academic writing. In this commentary, I explore the ethical implications of using GenAI in academic writing. I provide an overview of how GenAI works as a probabilistic model and what the limitations are, such as generating incorrect or entirely made-up information. I raise concerns about bias, misinformation, plagiarism, inequity of access and monetisation of knowledge and discuss how this implicates ethical values regarding plagiarism and research integrity. Despite these issues, I also acknowledge the potential of GenAI to advance academic writing by aiding in tasks like structuring text and summarising large bodies of information. I emphasise the need to be transparent about the use of GenAI and call for an open discussion on this contentious, yet important, topic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eline S. Rentier (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: