This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) is a chronic inflammatory condition, that leads to significant functional impairment and reduced quality of life. Despite its low incidence, treatment options are diverse and often ineffective, necessitating a review of recent therapeutic advances. This review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of recent therapeutic options for the treatment of PPP, focusing on phototherapy, systemic therapies, and biologics. A systematic literature search identified 13 studies evaluating phototherapy and systemic therapies, including biologics. Inclusion criteria focused on randomized controlled trials with participants diagnosed with PPP. Phototherapy showed success: excimer laser demonstrated high efficacy for severe disease [PPP Area and Severity Index (PPPASI)-75 of 95.0%], while psoralen plus ultraviolet A therapy with retinoids or fumaric acid esters worked well in milder disease (PPPASI-90 of 90.0 and 81.8%, respectively). Evidence supports the efficacy and safety of guselkumab, brodalumab, and apremilast over a range of disease severity (PPPASI-50 ranged from 57.4 to 78.3% at week 16). Agents including anakinra, secukinumab, spesolimab, and RIST4721 (primary outcomes not achieved) may not be first-line treatments. By targeting multiple inflammatory pathways in PPP, JAK inhibitors may be more effective than biologics in treating PPP; however, more research is needed to confirm their safety and appropriate use. Multiple new treatments exist for PPP with promising results, however longer-term studies with standardized outcome reporting are needed to determine optimal treatment strategies and their comparative efficacy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Branyiczky et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: