Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This research began in the summer 1978 with the support of the Danish Social Science Research Council. Thanks go to Ms. Margaret Figueroa, the first author's research assistant. A grant from the Duke University Research Council supported her efforts. This research tests Williamson's M-form hypothesis which posits an information imperative of organizational form instead of a technology imperative. The experimental design is a two-by-two factorial design. Two levels of decomposability of technology are the values for the first variable. The multidivisional form (M-form) and the unitary (U-form) are the values for the second variable. The data are generated from a perturbed decomposed mathematical programming model that is coordinated by a Dantzig-Wolfe pricing approach. The data are analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric approach. The results substantiate Williamson's hypothesis that the M-form of organization is superior to the U-form organization alternative. For each of the two levels of decomposability of technology, the M-form of organization yields higher profit solutions than the U-form.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burton et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: